Erdős Problem a Daythe open tracker

Erdős Problem #1097

OPENdatabase updated 2025-10-18

No proof or disproof is known, and it isn't known whether a finite computation could settle it.

What the community database records, not our verdict. erdosproblems.com no longer shows statuses (why).

Given a finite set of integers `A` (modelled as a `Finset ℤ`), the set `CommonDifferencesThreeTermAP A` consists of all integers `d` such that there is a non-trivial three-term arithmetic progression `a, b, c ∈ A` with `b - a = d` and `c - b = d`.

The main conjecture: for any finite set of integers \(A\) with \(|A| = n\), the number of distinct common differences in three-term arithmetic progressions is \(O(n^{3/2})\). This conjecture was resolved negatively by showing that the problem is exactly equivalent to Bourgain's sums-differences question [Bo99], which was introduced as an arithmetic path towards the Kakeya conjecture. Under this equivalence: - The greatest achievable exponent for this problem is equal to the smallest constant \(c\) achievable for Bourgain's sums-differences question: \[|A -_G B| \ll \max(|A|, |B|, |A +_G B|)^c\] - The \(O(n^{3/2})\) prediction is disproved because the lower bound has been shown to satisfy \(c \ge 1.77898\) (due to Zheng and AlphaEvolve [GGTW25], improving on Lemm [Le15]), which is strictly greater than \(3/2 = 1.5\). - The best known upper bound is \(c \le 11/6 \approx 1.833\) (due to Katz and Tao [KaTa99]). - While the specific \(O(n^{3/2})\) prediction is resolved negatively, the general question of determining the exact optimal exponent \(c\) remains open.
Statement as formalized in Formal Conjectures (Google DeepMind, Apache-2.0) · their label: research solved. The authoritative wording is on erdosproblems.com/1097.
Prizenone
Topicsnumber theory, additive combinatorics
Statement in LeanFormal Conjectures
Solution in Leanno
Original pageerdosproblems.com/1097
WORKING REPORT BY THIS SITE · JUL 27, 2026

Read our working report →

Exact exhaustive rational enumeration proves the signed maxima \(0,0,2,4,6,8,12\) for \(1\leq n\leq7\), with a standalone checker; the asymptotic exponent remains in the verified interval \(1.77898\ld

PARTIAL