Erdős Problem a Daythe open tracker

Erdős Problem #282

OPENdatabase updated 2025-08-31

No proof or disproof is known, and it isn't known whether a finite computation could settle it.

What the community database records, not our verdict. erdosproblems.com no longer shows statuses (why).

Let \(A\subseteq \mathbb{N}\) be an infinite set and consider the following greedy algorithm for a rational \(x\): choose the minimal \(n\in A\) not used so far such that \(n\geq 1/x\) and repeat with \(x\) replaced by \(x-\frac{1}{n}\). This process of subtracting unit fractions is modelled in `greedyUnitFractionRem`. At each step `t : ℕ`, the function `greedyUnitFractionRem A x t` returns the remainder of `x` with respect to the first `t + 1` unit fractions, with distinct denominators taken from `A`. Once

Let \(A\subseteq \mathbb{N}\) be an infinite set and consider the following greedy algorithm for a rational \(x\in (0,1)\): choose the minimal \(n\in A\) not used so far such that \(n\geq 1/x\) and repeat with \(x\) replaced by \(x-\frac{1}{n}\). If this terminates after finitely many steps then this produces a representation of \(x\) as the sum of distinct unit fractions with denominators from \(A\). Does this process always terminate if \(x\) has odd denominator and \(A\) is the set of odd numbers?
Statement as formalized in Formal Conjectures (Google DeepMind, Apache-2.0) · their label: research open · 3 further variants / known partial results in the Lean file. The authoritative wording is on erdosproblems.com/282.
Prizenone
Topicsnumber theory, unit fractions
Statement in LeanFormal Conjectures
Solution in Leanno
Original pageerdosproblems.com/282
WORKING REPORT BY THIS SITE · JUL 26, 2026

Read our working report →

Exact distinct-odd greedy termination verified for all 202,660 reduced fractions a/b with odd b<=999 (at most 27 terms), plus a rigorous reduction to the below-2/3 convention; uniform termination rema

PARTIAL