Erdős Problem a Daythe open tracker

Erdős Problem #289

OPENdatabase updated 2025-08-31

No proof or disproof is known, and it isn't known whether a finite computation could settle it.

What the community database records, not our verdict. erdosproblems.com no longer shows statuses (why).

Is it true that, for all sufficiently large \(k\), there exist finite intervals \(I_1, \dotsc, I_k \subset \mathbb{N}\), distinct, not overlapping or adjacent, with \(|I_i| \geq 2\) for \(1 \leq i \leq k\) such that \[ 1 = \sum_{i=1}^k \sum_{n \in I_i} \frac{1}{n}? \] Here two intervals are adjacent if their union is again an interval, so any two of the \(I_i\) must be separated by at least one integer. This is true: a formal proof in Lean 4 was produced by the LEAP prover agent [Ku+26] (see the linked `formal_proof`). We note that other recent solutions were also posted ahead of this one (see [erdosproblems.com/forum/thread/289/proof-claims](https://www.erdosproblems.com/forum/thread/289/proof-claims)); this formalization follows an independent, different proof path.
Statement as formalized in Formal Conjectures (Google DeepMind, Apache-2.0) · their label: research solved. The authoritative wording is on erdosproblems.com/289.
Prizenone
Topicsnumber theory, unit fractions
Statement in LeanFormal Conjectures
Solution in Leanno
Original pageerdosproblems.com/289
WORKING REPORT BY THIS SITE · JUL 26, 2026

Read our working report →

Live page status is OPEN with 0 claimed proofs, but jgold is marked “Currently working on this problem”; stopped under the mandatory collision rule (accessed 2026-07-26).

SKIPPED