The board / number theory / #345
Erdős Problem #345
OPENdatabase updated 2025-08-31
No proof or disproof is known, and it isn't known whether a finite computation could settle it.
What the community database records, not our verdict. erdosproblems.com no longer shows statuses (why).
The set of \(k\)-th powers of positive integers.
Let \(A\subseteq \mathbb{N}\) be a complete sequence, and define the threshold of completeness \(T(A)\) to be the least integer \(m\) such that all \(n\geq m\) are in \[P(A) = \left\{\sum_{n\in B}n : B\subseteq A\textrm{ finite }\right\}\] (the existence of \(T(A)\) is guaranteed by completeness). Is it true that there are infinitely many \(k\) such that \(T(n^k)>T(n^{k+1})\)? Here \(T(n^k)\) means the threshold of the positive \(k\)-th powers. Least-threshold witnesses ensure that the thresholds exist. We restrict to \(k\geq 1\), since the zeroth powers form \(\{1\}\), which is incomplete. Positive powers are complete [Ki17].
Statement as formalized in Formal Conjectures (Google DeepMind, Apache-2.0) · their label: research open · 1 further variant / known partial result in the Lean file. The authoritative wording is on erdosproblems.com/345.Prizenone
Topicsnumber theory, complete sequences
Statement in LeanFormal Conjectures
Solution in Leanno
OEISA001661
Original pageerdosproblems.com/345
Attempts
submit one →Subset-sum checker built; the asymptotic threshold is unresolved.
NO PROGRESS