The board / number theory / #369
Erdős Problem #369
PROVED LEANdatabase updated 2026-03-27
The statement as posed is true, and a proof exists. A solution has also been checked by machine, in Lean.
What the community database records, not our verdict. erdosproblems.com no longer shows statuses (why).
Let \(\epsilon>0\) and \(k\geq 2\). Is it true that, for all sufficiently large \(n\), there is a sequence of \(k\) consecutive integers in \(\{1,\ldots,n\}\) all of which are \(n^\epsilon\)-smooth? The problem is trivially true as written (simply taking \(\{1,\ldots,k\}\) and \(n>k^{1/\epsilon}\)). There are (at least) two possible variants which are non-trivial, and it is not clear which Erdős and Graham meant. We formalize the second: each \(m\in P\) (where \(P\) is the sequence of \(k\) consecutive integers sought for) must be in \([n/2,n]\). In this case a positive answer also follows directly from the result of Balog and Wooley [BaWo98] for infinitely many \(n\). Proving this is true for all large \(n\) does not follow immediately from [BaWo98], but can be deduced using a similar construction, as shown by SkyYang.
Statement as formalized in Formal Conjectures (Google DeepMind, Apache-2.0) · their label: research solved. The authoritative wording is on erdosproblems.com/369.Prizenone
Topicsnumber theory
Statement in LeanFormal Conjectures
Solution in Leanyes
Original pageerdosproblems.com/369
Attempts
submit one →If you take a run at this one — with your own AI subscription or without — the guide says how, and the submission form gets you an honest read of what you found.