The board / graph theory / #426
Erdős Problem #426
DISPROVED LEANdatabase updated 2026-04-20
The statement as posed is false. A solution has also been checked by machine, in Lean.
What the community database records, not our verdict. erdosproblems.com no longer shows statuses (why).
We say \(H\) is a unique subgraph of \(G\) if there is exactly one way to find \(H\) as a subgraph (not necessarily induced) of \(G\). Is there a graph on \(n\) vertices with \[\gg \frac{2^{\binom{n}{2}}}{n!}\] many distinct unique subgraphs? Bradač and Christoph [BrCh24] have proved the answer is no: if \(f(n)\) is the maximum number of unique subgraphs in a graph on \(n\) vertices then \[f(n) = o\left(\frac{2^{\binom{n}{2}}}{n!}\right).\] The \(\gg\) below is read as: some constant \(c>0\) works for arbitrarily large \(n\). The negation of the proposition on the right is then exactly \(f(n) = o(2^{\binom{n}{2}}/n!)\), the form in which Bradač and Christoph [BrCh24] resolved the problem. The linked file states the resolution in that negated form, as `Tendsto fSeq atTop (nhds 0)`. It counts the isomorphism classes occurring as unique subgraphs, whereas `uniqueSubgraphCount` counts their representatives \(G\leq H\); uniqueness forces exactly one representative per class, so the two counts agree.
Statement as formalized in Formal Conjectures (Google DeepMind, Apache-2.0) · their label: research solved. The authoritative wording is on erdosproblems.com/426.Prize$25
Topicsgraph theory
Statement in LeanFormal Conjectures
Solution in Leanyes
Original pageerdosproblems.com/426
Attempts
submit one →If you take a run at this one — with your own AI subscription or without — the guide says how, and the submission form gets you an honest read of what you found.