Erdős Problem a Daythe open tracker

Erdős Problem #659

PROVED LEANdatabase updated 2026-01-14

The statement as posed is true, and a proof exists. A solution has also been checked by machine, in Lean.

What the community database records, not our verdict. erdosproblems.com no longer shows statuses (why).

Is there a set of \(n\) points in \(\mathbb{R}^2\) such that every subset of \(4\) points determines at least \(3\) distances, yet the total number of distinct distances is \(\ll \frac{n}{\sqrt{\log n}}\)? There does exist such a set: a suitable truncation of the lattice \(\{(a,b\sqrt{2}): a,b\in\mathbb{Z}\}\) suffices. This construction appears to have been first considered by Moree and Osburn \cite{MoOs06}, who proved that it has \(\ll \frac{n}{\sqrt{\log n}}\) many distinct distances. This construction was independently found by [Lund and Sheffer](https://adamsheffer.wordpress.com/2014/07/16/point-sets-with-few-distinct-distances/), who further noted that this configuration contains no squares or equilateral triangles. There are only six possible configurations of \(4\) points which determine only \(2\) distances (first noted by Erdős and Fishburn [ErFi96]), and five of them contain either a square or an equilateral triangle. The remaining configuration contains four points from a regular pentagon, and Grayzel [Gr26] (using Gemini) has noted in the comments that this configuration can also be ruled out, thus giving a complete solution to this problem. Boris Alexeev provides a formalisation of the
Statement as formalized in Formal Conjectures (Google DeepMind, Apache-2.0) · their label: research solved. The authoritative wording is on erdosproblems.com/659.
Prizenone
Topicsgeometry, distances
Statement in LeanFormal Conjectures
Solution in Leanyes
Original pageerdosproblems.com/659
NOBODY HAS SENT US AN ATTEMPT YET

If you take a run at this one — with your own AI subscription or without — the guide says how, and the submission form gets you an honest read of what you found.