Erdős Problem #787
No proof or disproof is known, and it isn't known whether a finite computation could settle it.
What the community database records, not our verdict. erdosproblems.com no longer shows statuses (why).
`g G n` is the largest `m` such that every set `A` of `n` elements of `G` has a subset `B` with \(\lvert B\rvert \geq m\) and \(b_1 + b_2 \notin A\) for all distinct \(b_1, b_2 \in B\) [Er65, p. 187]. The problem takes `G = ℝ`. The condition on `B` is `Disjoint B.restrictedSumset A`. For `G = ℝ` or `G = ℤ`, the set of such `m` contains `0` and is bounded by `n`, so `sSup` is its maximum, not a junk value.
Attempts
submit one →Read our working report →
Exact, from-scratch computer-certified values are \(g(n)=1,2,3,4\) on \(n=1\!-\!3,4\!-\!7,8\!-\!13,14\!-\!19\), respectively; the asymptotic problem remains open.
PARTIAL