Erdős Problem a Daythe open tracker

Erdős Problem #820

OPENdatabase updated 2025-08-31

No proof or disproof is known, and it isn't known whether a finite computation could settle it.

What the community database records, not our verdict. erdosproblems.com no longer shows statuses (why).

\(H(n)\) is the smallest integer \(l\) such that there is some \(k < l\) with \((k^n-1, l^n-1) = 1\). We take \(k\) and \(l\) to be integers with \(k \geq 2\), so that \(k^n - 1 \geq 1\) for \(n \geq 1\). Smaller \(k\) give degenerate values: over the integers \(k = 0\) gives \((-1, l^n-1) = 1\), and \(k = 1\) gives \((0, l^n-1) = l^n-1\), which is \(1\) for \(n = 1\), \(l = 2\). Both would contradict the value \(H(1) = 3\) listed in the source. For \(n \geq 1\) the set is nonempty (see `Erdos820.H_spec`). For \(n = 0\) it is empty, a

\(K(n)\) is the smallest integer \(k \geq 2\) such that \((k^n-1, 2^n-1) = 1\). As for `Erdos820.H`, smaller \(k\) are excluded because they give degenerate values. For \(n \geq 2\) the value \(k = 2\) never works, and \(k = 2^n - 1\) always works. For \(n = 1\) we get \(K(1) = 2\), and for \(n = 0\) the set is empty, so `K 0 = 0`.

Let \(H(n)\) be the smallest integer \(l\) such that there exists \(k < l\) with \((k^n-1, l^n-1) = 1\). Is it true that \(H(n) = 3\) infinitely often? That is, is \((2^n-1, 3^n-1) = 1\) for infinitely many \(n\) (see `Erdos820.H_eq_three_iff`)? The request to estimate \(H(n)\) is open-ended and not formalised; the variants below state the specific questions that are asked. See also Erdős Problem 770.
Statement as formalized in Formal Conjectures (Google DeepMind, Apache-2.0) · their label: research open · 3 further variants / known partial results in the Lean file. The authoritative wording is on erdosproblems.com/820.
Prizenone
Topicsnumber theory
Statement in LeanFormal Conjectures
Solution in Leanno
OEISA263647
Original pageerdosproblems.com/820
WORKING REPORT BY THIS SITE · JUL 27, 2026

Read our working report →

The authoritative live page is OPEN but lists “1 claimed proof for this problem”; per the mandatory collision rule, no mathematical attempt was made.

SKIPPED