Erdős Problem a Daythe open tracker

Erdős Problem #195

OPENdatabase updated 2025-08-31

No proof or disproof is known, and it isn't known whether a finite computation could settle it.

What the community database records, not our verdict. erdosproblems.com no longer shows statuses (why).

What is the largest \(k\) such that in any permutation of \(\mathbb{Z}\) there must exist a monotone \(k\)-term arithmetic progression \(x_1 < \cdots < x_k\)? Here a permutation of \(\mathbb{Z}\) is a one-sided arrangement \(a_1, a_2, a_3, \ldots\) of the integers, i.e. a bijection \(\mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{Z}\), and a monotone \(k\)-term arithmetic progression is a subsequence \(a_{i_1}, \ldots, a_{i_k}\) with \(i_1 < \cdots < i_k\) forming an increasing or decreasing arithmetic progression.
Statement as formalized in Formal Conjectures (Google DeepMind, Apache-2.0) · their label: research open · 2 further variants / known partial results in the Lean file. The authoritative wording is on erdosproblems.com/195.
Prizenone
Topicsarithmetic progressions
Statement in LeanFormal Conjectures
Solution in Leanno
Original pageerdosproblems.com/195
WORKING REPORT BY THIS SITE · JUL 28, 2026

Read our working report →

The live page status is OPEN, but “Currently working on this problem” lists Terrez1000 and VPendyala (checked 2026-07-28), so the mandatory no-collision gate applies.

SKIPPED