ERDŐS/DAILY

← back to the ledger

ERDőS #944 · PARTIAL

Erdős problem #944 — wave6r report

Date: 2026-07-27 (UTC)

Claim labels used throughout:

conclusion, not asserted as a theorem.

but not accompanied by a formal SAT proof certificate.

0. Mandatory live-page audit

I fetched the live page through the Bright Data browser path, not by datacentre

curl. The browser reached

erdosproblems.com/944 and its discussion

thread on 2026-07-27.

Live status:

Thus the mandatory stop condition did not fire.

The page defines deletion-criticality by a strict decrease of chromatic number.

Here is its displayed question verbatim:

> Let \(k\geq 4\) and \(r\geq 1\). Must there exist a graph \(G\) with chromatic number \(k\) such that every vertex is critical, yet every critical set of edges has size \(>r\)?

In formulas, an edge set \(R\) is critical when

\(\chi(G-R)<\chi(G)\), and \(G\) is \(k\)-vertex-critical when

\(\chi(G)=k\) and \(\chi(G-v)=k-1\) for every vertex \(v\).

Results listed on the live page

\(k-1\) is not prime; Jensen settled every \(k\geq5,r=1\).

large \(k=k(r)\).

only open value of \(k\) is \(4\), already open for \(r=1\).

prove \(f_k(n)\to\infty\) for \(k\geq5\), with

\[ n^{1/3}\ll_k f_k(n)\ll_k \frac{n}{(\log n)^C}, \]

where \(C>0\) is absolute.

collection and links Problems 917 and 1032.

The two live comments

1. (d) A comment dated 2026-06-18 points to

arXiv:2606.18462. It reports an exact

census of 6-regular graphs through order 15, restrictions on nontrivial

6-edge-cuts, and the exclusion of bipartite cut shores. It explicitly says

that the 6-regular subproblem remains unresolved.

2. (c) A comment dated 2025-08-22 notes the \(k\)-dependence in the displayed

asymptotic bounds. The current LaTeX page already renders the bounds with

\(\ll_k\), and with an absolute logarithmic exponent.

Comments on the site are explicitly marked as unverified user content. The

first one was checked against the cited arXiv preprint before being used below.

1. Primary-source literature audit

The following sources were located and checked for the claims attributed to

them:

DOI 10.1016/0012-365X(92)90354-I:

its abstract gives a 5-vertex-critical example with no critical edge.

DOI 10.1016/S0012-365X(02)00394-1:

its abstract states the \(k-1\) nonprime cases.

journal record;

the all-\(k\geq5\) consequence is also stated explicitly in the later primary

sources below.

graphs*, Math-Net full record and PDF:

it constructs arbitrarily large 4-vertex-critical graphs with

\(\Omega(n^2)\) noncritical edges and only \(O(n)\) critical edges.

arXiv:2310.12891, Theorem 1: every fixed

\(r\) works for all sufficiently large \(k\).

arXiv:2508.08703: all \(k\geq5\) and

\(r\geq1\), the quantitative bounds, and Proposition 5.1 below.

6-regular case of Dirac's \(k=4\) problem*,

arXiv:2606.18462: the preprint and its

ancillary source archive exist and contain the claims summarized by the

newest live comment.

Targeted searches for the exact problem, the phrase “6-regular

4-vertex-critical”, and post-2025 work on Dirac's \(k=4\) case found no claimed

resolution later than arXiv:2606.18462. (c) This is a documented search

miss, not a proof that no other relevant manuscript exists.

Two current structural facts guide the computation:

\(\lambda(G)\geq3r+3\), hence \(\delta(G)\geq3r+3\), for every

\((4,r)\)-graph. For \(r=1\), degree 6 is the sparsest possible case, and

their Problem 5.2 asks whether a 6-regular example exists.

graphs of order at most 15 there is only one 4-vertex-critical graph, at

order 13, and it has 13 critical edges. Thus it reports no 6-regular target

through order 15. The computation below does not ingest that graph or those

census files.

2. New finite result

Computational theorem

(d) Let

\[ C(n;a,b,c)=\operatorname{Cay}\!\left( \mathbb Z_n,\{\pm a,\pm b,\pm c\}\right) \]

be a simple 6-regular circulant. If \(7\leq n\leq80\) and

\(C(n;a,b,c)\) is 4-vertex-critical, then it has at least one full

distance-orbit of critical edges. Consequently:

1. no 6-regular circulant \((4,1)\)-graph has order at most 80; and

2. every 4-vertex-critical graph in this finite class has at least \(n\)

critical edges, hence at least one third of its \(3n\) edges are critical.

The edge bound is sharp within the computed class: \(C(13;1,2,5)\) has exactly

one critical distance-orbit, hence exactly 13 critical edges.

This extends the unrestricted order-15 census only inside the substantial but

special class of circulant graphs. It does not settle the 6-regular

subproblem, much less Problem #944.

3. Elementary reductions used by the checker

3.1 Complete parametrisation of the searched class

(a) An undirected circulant has a symmetric nonzero connection set

\(S=-S\subseteq\mathbb Z_n\). A non-self-inverse generator occurs with its

negative and contributes degree 2. When \(n\) is even, \(n/2\) is the unique

nonzero self-inverse element; including it would make \(|S|\) odd. Therefore

every degree-6 connection set consists of exactly three pairs

\[ S=\{\pm a,\pm b,\pm c\},\qquad 1\leq aIt is connected exactly when \(\gcd(n,a,b,c)=1\). A vertex-critical graph is

connected, so omitting triples with larger gcd loses no target.

Thus iterating these triples is a complete enumeration of the relevant

circulants, although different triples can still define isomorphic unlabeled

graphs. All counts below are deliberately counts of canonical distance

triples, not isomorphism classes; duplication cannot invalidate a zero count.

3.2 Vertex-transitivity reduction

(a) Translation acts transitively on \(C(n;a,b,c)\). Hence all

vertex-deleted subgraphs are isomorphic. Such a circulant is

4-vertex-critical exactly when:

  • \(G\) is not 3-colourable; and
  • \(G-0\) is 3-colourable.

Indeed the second condition gives \(\chi(G)\leq4\) by assigning a fourth colour

to 0, while the first gives equality; translation handles every deleted

vertex.

3.3 Exact singleton criterion for critical edges

(a) Let \(G\) be 4-vertex-critical and \(uv\in E(G)\). Then \(uv\) is

critical if and only if some proper 3-colouring of \(G-v\) makes \(u\) the

unique neighbour of \(v\) in its colour.

  • If such a colouring exists, give \(v\) the colour of \(u\) after deleting

\(uv\); this 3-colours \(G-uv\).

  • Conversely, in a 3-colouring of \(G-uv\), the endpoints must have equal

colours, since otherwise the colouring would also colour \(G\). No other

neighbour of \(v\) can have that colour, since its edge to \(v\) remains.

For a circulant, translations and reflection \(x\mapsto-x\) make the edges at

distance \(d\) one orbit. It is therefore enough to test

\((0,a),(0,b),(0,c)\). A positive singleton witness for one representative

certifies all \(n\) edges in that orbit as critical.

4. Exact census

The verifier considered 171,551 connected distance triples over

\(7\leq n\leq80\). Its exhaustive partition was:

| Classification of a distance triple | Count |

|---|---:|

| \(G\) is 3-colourable | 129,753 |

| \(G\) and \(G-0\) are both non-3-colourable | 35,992 |

| \(G\) is 4-vertex-critical | 5,806 |

| Total | 171,551 |

Across the 5,806 vertex-critical triples, the program found 6,448 critical

distance-orbit incidences and zero triples with no critical orbit.

Only the following orders have any 4-vertex-critical triples. Every omitted

order in \(7,\ldots,80\) has count zero.

| \(n\) | 4-VC triples | Critical-orbit incidences | Target triples |

|---:|---:|---:|---:|

| 13 | 6 | 6 | 0 |

| 16 | 4 | 4 | 0 |

| 19 | 27 | 27 | 0 |

| 22 | 15 | 15 | 0 |

| 25 | 60 | 60 | 0 |

| 28 | 30 | 30 | 0 |

| 31 | 120 | 135 | 0 |

| 34 | 64 | 64 | 0 |

| 37 | 216 | 234 | 0 |

| 40 | 68 | 72 | 0 |

| 43 | 294 | 315 | 0 |

| 46 | 154 | 154 | 0 |

| 49 | 357 | 399 | 0 |

| 52 | 168 | 168 | 0 |

| 55 | 260 | 260 | 0 |

| 58 | 280 | 294 | 0 |

| 61 | 600 | 690 | 0 |

| 64 | 224 | 224 | 0 |

| 67 | 660 | 693 | 0 |

| 70 | 180 | 180 | 0 |

| 73 | 936 | 1,224 | 0 |

| 76 | 342 | 342 | 0 |

| 79 | 741 | 858 | 0 |

| Total | 5,806 | 6,448 | 0 |

(d) In this finite range, 4-vertex-critical triples occur only for

\(n\equiv1\pmod3\). No uniform claim is made from that pattern.

5. Reproduction and independent checks

The standalone verifier is

erdos944_wave6r_verify.py.

Run:

python runs/erdos944_wave6r_verify.py --max-n 80

The completed run used Python 3.12.3, python-sat 1.9.dev7, and one Intel Xeon

Platinum 8259CL core. Wall time was 323.463 seconds. The script's SHA-256 was

c438701e0d956b1b4c2642e9a2567dc455b347e719c8644283122d7646d89898

Verification design:

1. The script constructs every graph and every CNF from the integers

\(n,a,b,c\); it reads no graph database or paper certificate.

2. It asserts \(3n\) distinct edges and degree exactly 6 for every generated

graph.

3. Colour variables \(x_{v,i}\) and guarded activity variables encode proper

3-colourings. Assumptions with all vertices active test \(G\); changing the

sign of the activity literal for 0 tests \(G-0\).

4. Every SAT model is decoded and checked edge-by-edge outside the SAT solver.

Singleton witnesses are additionally checked directly on \(N(0)\).

5. Every UNSAT decision, and every SAT/UNSAT critical-orbit decision, is run

through both CaDiCaL 1.5.3 and Glucose 4.2. They agreed on every call.

6. The three top-level classifications are asserted to partition the generated

triples. A fresh order-80 run then checks the four aggregate regression

values \(171551,5806,6448,0\).

The two solvers are independent algorithms, but no DRAT/LRAT traces were

retained. The result is therefore honestly labelled (d) computational-only,

not a machine-checked theorem.

As a low-order external sanity check, the six order-13 circulant

parametrisations each have exactly one critical orbit. This agrees with the

unrestricted order-13 result reported in arXiv:2606.18462, but that agreement

is not used in the census.

6. Exact remaining wall

There are three distinct gaps.

1. Uniform circulant gap. The finite computation would become a theorem

for all degree-6 circulants if one proved:

> If \(C(n;a,b,c)-0\) is 3-colourable but \(C(n;a,b,c)\) is not, then some

> 3-colouring of the deleted graph has a singleton colour on

> \(\{\pm a,\pm b,\pm c\}\).

By Section 3.3 this is exactly the missing lemma saying that a critical

distance-orbit must exist. The finite \(n\equiv1\pmod3\) pattern does not

supply the needed uniformity.

2. Noncirculant degree-6 gap. Even a proof of that lemma would not settle

Skottova--Steiner Problem 5.2. The known enumeration jumps from

1,470,293,675 connected 6-regular graphs at order 15 to

113,314,233,808 at order 16; see Meringer's

regular-graph table.

A blind order-16 extension at a realistic sustained

\(5\times10^4\)–\(2\times10^5\) generated-and-classified graphs/second would

cost roughly 160–630 core-hours, before independent certification. I did

not run it.

3. Full problem gap. A \((4,1)\)-graph need only have minimum degree 6; it

need not be regular or vertex-transitive. Moreover Problem #944 asks every

\(r\), while even \(k=4,r=1\) is open. The present computation neither

constructs a target nor rules out those broader graph classes.

The concrete progress is therefore a checked obstruction in a natural

symmetry class, together with an exact singleton lemma identifying what a

uniform circulant argument must prove.

PARTIAL: Exhaustively cross-checked all 171,551 connected 6-regular circulant parameter triples through order 80; every one of the 5,806 four-vertex-critical cases has a critical edge orbit, so no circulant target occurs in this range.

This is the AI working report, labelled by outcome — not an independently verified claim unless marked PROVED. ← ledger